A Tuvalu National Curriculum in its
Educational and Administrative Contexts
Final Report for the Tuvalu Curriculum Framework
Consultancy Mission
Prepared by
Adjunct Professor Ron Toomey
Australian Catholic University
'And
Rejieli Racule
University of the South Pacific
Submitted by
RMIT International Pty Ltd
ACN 071 369 545
ABN 54 071 369 545
Contact:
Mr Peter Thompson
General Manager - Business Development Division
RMIT International Pty Ltd
Level 5,255 Bourke Street

Melbourne VIC 3000
Phone: (6 13) 9925 5 159

Fax:
(61 3) 9925 5 1 53
Project No.
1100094

Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all those people who made a contribution to the Tuvalu
Curriculum Consultancy Mission. The Director of the Department of Education and
his staff were very helpfbl in providing material and arranging meetings and
appointments during their already very busy schedules. The Secretary of Education
and Sport within the Government of Tuvalu was generous with her time. The
Principal and staff of MSS were very helpfbl with providing information about the
curriculum and related matters at their school. The Principals of the Primary Schools
were very welcoming and accommodating.
The SPBEA was very helpful in supplying a range of material and policies. The
Ministry of Education in Fiji was also helpfid with relevant curriculum and
examination material.
Ron Toomey and Rejieli Racule
Suva
1
2/5/04

Final Reeort for the Tuvalu Curriculum Framework Consultancy Mission
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................... I
.
INTRODUCTION .................................................... 1
CURRICULUM
.
CONTEXT ............................................
2
CURRENT CURRICULUM
.
ARRANGEMENTS ...........................
2
DESIGN
.
ISSUES ..................................................... 3
OTHER CURRICULUM ISSUES .........................................
4
5.1
--
Standards
----------- ......................................................................................................
4
5.2 School
-
Level Curriculum
....................................................................
Issues
6
5.3 Assessment
-
......................................................................................
Issues..
6
5.4 M~agement
-
......................................................................................
Issues
. 6
5.5 Curriculum
-
Issues Identified bv MES Personnel and Motufoua SS
....
Staff.. . 8
5.6 Issues
-
about Vocational Education ................................................................
8
CURRICULUM PRINCIPLES ...........................................
8
TOWARDS A NATIONAL CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK: OPTIONS AND
IMPLICATIONS ...................................................... 9
7.1 Option
-
1 - A Model Based on Limited Reform ........................................ 10
7.2 Implications
-
of Option 1.. ............................................................................ 1 1
7.3 O
- ption 2 - A Comprehensive
...........................................................
Model
12
. .
7.4 Im~hcat~ons
-
of Option 2 .............................................................................. 13
7.5
Option
-
3 - A Vocational Centre Model ....................................................... 14
7.6 Implications
-
of Option 3.. ............................................................................ 15
OVERVIEW OF MODELS ............................................. 15
FORWARD PLAN .................................................... 16
TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................. 16
10.1 Responses to the TORS for the Initial Phase of the Tuvalu Curriculum
Consultanc~
Mission ................................................................................... 16
10.2
-.-
Responses to the Terns of Reference f ~ r
the Final Phase of the Mission ..... 20
RECOMMENDATIONS ..............................................
26
REFERENCES ...................................................
2 6

ANNEX 1: CONSULTATIONS ...............................................
27

Final Report for the Tuvalu Cum~culum
Framework Consultancy Mission
Acronyms and Abbreviations
CAT
Common Assessment Tasks
CDU
Curriculum Development Unit
DOE
Department of Education
EFL
Education for Life
EO
Education Officer
FJC
Fiji Junior Certificate
Govt
Government
HOD
Head of Department
HS
High School
ICT
Information and Communication Technology
IoE
Institute of Education
LTA
Long Term Advisor
MES
Ministry of Education and Sport
MSS
Motufoua Secondary School
NZUBE
New Zealand University Bursary Examination
PILLS
Pacific Islands Literacy Levels
PSSC
Pacific Secondary School Certificate
RMIT
RMIT International Pty Ltd
SEO
Senior Education Officer
SPBEA
South Pacific Board of Educational Assessment
SS
Secondary School
STA
Short Term Advisor
TA
Technical Assistant
TAESP
Tuvalu Australia Education Support Project
TOR
Terms of Reference
TSC
Tuvalu School Certificate
USP
University of South Pacific
VET
Vocational Education and Training

Final Report for the Tuvalu Curriculum Framework Consultancy Mission
1 Introduction
In response to a request from the Tuvalu Government, AusAID commissioned in June
2003 a Technical Assistance project designed to assist with the construction of a
curriculum framework for secondary education in Tuvalu. The project was initiated to
assist the Government of Tuvalu to review its current secondary school curriculum
arrangements, to help it identify the major curriculum issues at the secondary level
and advise it on ways of addressing these issues. This is the final report on the project.
The TORS for the initial phase of the mission were:
to review curriculum arrangements,
consult with Ministry officials on curriculum issues,
consult with relevant regional organisations about curriculum issues,
advise and assist the Ministry of Education to identie the key problems of the
current system,
advise and assist the Ministry of Education to develop appropriate and achievable
responses to these immediate problems
provide advice on the Ministry's broader plans to introduce:
1 Junior secondary schools,
Form 7 at Motufoua; and
I
to develop a Tuvaluan curriculum, with particular reference to the current
administrative capacity of the Ministry of Education. This should include
views on the implications of these changes for ongoing curriculum
management, curriculum development and training and the implementation of
new curricula.
Responses to these ToRs were provided in the Interim Report that was accepted by
the Government of Tuvalu and AusAID in mid 2003. They are reiterated in Section 10
of this report. It will be noted that part of Section 10 constitutes the principal
consultant's response to TORS 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 above. The final phase of the mission
has concentrated on the remaining task of advising and assisting the Ministry of
Education to develop appropriate and achievable responses to the immediate problems
regarding the secondary curriculum. In other words, addressing TOR 5 above in detail.
The details of the approach to TOR 5 above are set out in the ToRs for the final phase
of the mission. The TORS for the final phase of the mission were:
Conduct consultations with the staff at Motufoua HS regarding the recommended
national curriculum framework outlined in the interim report.
Assist staff of the Tuvalu Department of Education with the preparation of a final
draft of a national curriculum framework for consideration by the Government of
Tuvalu.
Assist staff of the Tuvalu Department of Education with the preparation of a final
draft of a proposal for the reform of the junior secondary curriculum for
consideration by the Government of Tuvalu.
Assist staff of the Tuvalu Department of Education with the preparation of a final
draft of a long-term forward plan for the reform of the secondary curriculum for
consideration by the Government of Tuvalu.

Prepare a final report on the consultancy mission for AusAlD and the Government
of Tuvalu incorporating comments, if any, from AusAID and the Government of
Tuvalu.
2 Curriculum Context
All curricula exist in an administrative and educational context. The administrative
context usually has to do with what provision there is for curriculum materials
support, professional development opportunities, infra-structural support and the like.
The educational context includes such things as teacher competence, student ability,
national or state policy priorities for education and related things.
The administrative and educational contexts of a curriculum shape the form and
content of the curriculum at the school level. This mission is primarily concerned with
the school level curriculum in Tuvalu and the administrative and educational contexts
in which it is located. The mission has been concerned to identifjr the major
educational and administrative issues that are impacting on the school level
curriculum. It has also been concerned to suggest possible responses to the issues.
This report canvasses three alternatives for a national curriculum framework and the
details of the secondary curriculum within those fiameworks. They constitute a range
of advice about the possibilities for a revised Tuvaluan curriculum structure and its
management. The scenarios provided in the report also provide a range of advice
about priorities for support, both from donor agencies and from the Ministry of
Education, that will be necessary to assist with the implementation of a revised
curriculum structure.
3 Current Curriculum Arrangements
The current curriculum arrangements in Tuvalu are mapped on Figure 1 below.
Pacific Secondary School Certificate
Externally assessed by SPBEA.
Oflered at Motufoua:
External and school based CATS.
Subjects: English, Chemistry, Accounting, Satisfactorily completed subjects
Development Studies, Mathematics,
recorded on certificate as a grade
Geography, History, Physics, Biology,
(1 -9) or assessment descriptor
Design Technology, Economics,
Technical Drawing and Religious Studies.
Not oflered at Motufma:
Agriculture,
French,
Computer Studies.
There are other providers including Fetuvalu SS and private providers of vocational education accredited by the
DOE.


Tuvalu School Certificate
Subjects:
by SPBEA.
Accounting, Economics, Science,
Satisfactorily completed subjects
Geography, History, Mathematics,
recorded on certificate as a grade
Technical Drawing, Woodwork, Food &
(1 -9)
Nutrition.
Fiji Junior Certificate
FJC: English, Mathematics, Social
Core Subjects:
Science, Basic Science and best
Mathematics, Social Science, Basic
two others.
Science, English
Possible score = 300
Electives:
Agriculture, Economics, Wood Work,
Technical Drawing, Home Economics,
Accounting.
Classes 1 & 2: Creative Activities, Tuvalu Screening test set by secondary
Language, English, Mathematics, Physical teachers at Year 8 for streaming
Education, Printing, Singing, Social
purposes.
Science.
PILLS at Years 4 and 6 every
Classes 3-6: Tuvalu Language, English,
second year
Social Science, Elementary Science,
Mathematics, Music, Art and Craft,
Physical Education.
Classes 7-8: Commercial Studies,
Elementary Science, Tuvalu Language,
English, Home Economics, Mathematics,
Music, Physical Education, Social
Science, Technical Drawing.
TAESP: English, Mathematics, Science,
Social Science, Health, Business Studies
(7&8 only).
No formal curriculum.
4 Design Issues
From a curriculum design perspective the present curriculum arrangement presents a
number of issues. The current curriculum offerings are not consistent in name or
substance across three separate certificate courses. Moreover, the curriculum offerings
are inconsistent with the broader policy of "an open system of quality education
which provides all Tuvaluans with equal access". Access is in fact denied to many,
especially in the senior secondary years. Nor is the system "open" at the senior
secondary level. It is not a national system. It is also an incomplete framework as very
little exists in the area of Early Childhood Education.
More specifically at the secondary level there is a blend of certificate courses, one
Fijian, another involving material from Tuvalu, Kiribas and Western Samoa and the
other a regional certificate. The number of external examinations and accompanying
certificates seems inordinate. The reliance on such a set of credentials leads to a set of
disjointed and disconnected offerings many with a tertiary selection orientation that is
out of step with the needs of most Tuvaluan youth. It is sometimes culturally

. .
. .
. . . .
.
&

. . -
. .
'
Consultancy Mission
within the secondarv curriculum. The
I.&
components of the FJC,
TSC andPSSC have very few substantive~connections
other
than thoseymade- by-the teachem--Furthermore, the Cambridge Certificate that is
offered at ~ e ( u v & High School -is quite inconsistent with what occurs elsewhere.
Throughout the secondary curriculum there is also an unnecessary emphasis on
competition. There are many assessment issues right across thz system. The outcomes
of PILLS,
for'exiinple, are not used as "education feedback". In general, there is too
much assessment (in the examination sense) and most of it is used for surnmative
purposes or student progression. There is a noticeable lack of diagnostic and
formative assessment.
5 Other Curriculum Issues
The environmental scan conducted during the first phase of the curriculum
consultancy and the curriculum research study conducted as part of the final phase of
the mission reveal numerous other curriculum issues that will need to be addressed by
any new national curriculum framework. One of those issues is that of educational
standards.
5.1
Standards
A key function of a national curriculum framework, its details and its implementation
is to produce quality educational outcomes. There has been considerable concern over
the years about educational standards in Tuvalu (ADB, 2002, Westover, 2000). It
appears that standards have, until very recently, been declining when measured on the
basis of performance on examinations. At the senior secondary level it appears that
this situation is being redressed as indicated on the following table.
Mathematics
64
52
44
5 1
47
52
Physics
62
57
42
55
54
56
Technical
Drawing
45
53
46
49
NA
NA
2, thirty-four students presented for the Tuvalu Secondary Certificate. The
g table indicates pass rates calculated from the raw scores of candidates.
. . . . . . . .
ar raw score data for 2003 were not available. There was a general view though that the situation was
'ng which is supported by the figures that were available. It appears that performances in Accounting,
Mathematics, English and Woodwork were all superior to those of 2002.

Mathematics
3 8
English
42
Technical Drawing
42
Wood Work
55
I Food and Nutrition
55
Standards in the F G ~
Junior Certificate at Motufuoa SS have been a concern for many
years. Notwithstanding the improvements of recent times, the general pattern of poor
performance still gives cause for concern as the following table indicates.
Student Performance on F.TC 1994 - 2003
There are other issues regarding standards in Tuvalu. At the end of Form 2, which is
conducted in the Primary Schools, the children sit the Tuvalu Secondary School
Entrance Examination. This examination is used to select students for admission to
Motufoua SS. Fewer than half those presenting for the examination are successful. '
Mostly the unsuccessful students either repeat or "drop out". There is some evidence
that the main problem areas are English and Mathematics. Similarly there is evidence
thdt the problem may be in part a teaching issue where the Primary trained teachers
are inadequately prepared to teaching Forms 1 and 2 Mathematics and English.

Tuvalu Curriculum
chool Level Curriculum Issues
to Motufoua Secondary Sch
lum implementation study c
discussions with teachers and others suggest that the secondary school is confronting
a number of quite particular curriculum issues. There are very substantial resource
issues with outdated and sometimes inappropriate material; having to be used.
Facilities in Science and Home Economics are in serious disrepair. There appears to
be a lower priority for the provision of such resources to MSS. In a list of priorities
for NZAID funds, the University of the South Pacific's Augmented Program's
facilities at Funafuti were put ahead of those at MSS. The position of a laboratory
technician has been advertised at the USP Foundation Centre. However there are only
34 students currently attending the Centre (with only a proportion of them studying
sciences) compared to 430 students at MSS with no working laboratories or lab
assistants. At MSS the situation regarding school supplies is quite desperate. Very
little money is allocated to this. As an example, there are no dusters available this
year, let alone textbooks. Money allocated to the school seems to be shifted to other
departments without consultation with the school. ICT is very limited. MSS has
access to only three computers and fax and phone facilities are at best erratic.
At MSS the majority of the Forms 3 and 4 teachers hold Diplomas as distinct from
degrees. There is a need for such teachers to upgrade their academic qualifications to
degree level and thus increase the depth of their knowledge in their subject areas.
There are also some who need teacher-training to gain professional qualifications.
We feel that there is a need for on-going professional development courses for MSS
staff on teaching and learning styles, and techniques, as well as critical thinking about
curriculum and assessment issues and that there is a need for regular visits to MSS by
curriculum and pedagogical experts.
5.3 Assessment Issues
There are many assessment issues right across the system. The outcomes of PILLS are
not used, for example, as "education feedback". In general, there is too much
assessment (in the examination sense) and most of it is used for summative pu-rposes .
or student progression. There is very little diagnostic or formative assessment. This is
inconsistent with emerging policies and practices at the 'Fiji Ministry of Education and
SPBEA both of which are moving away from competitive academic assessment and
encouraging their client groups to do so too.
5.4 Management Issues
The tasks of developing both a comprehensive curriculum framework for Tuvalu and
riate management structures and
requires both suitable materials
a program of reform from at' least two
.- ---
-
-

the national budget has relatively recently grown from 13;2percCnt'(l996) to
cent (2001). Only two other ministries share anythinglike that-pidportion of
onal budget namely Environment, and Works & Communications~H6wever,
's very substantial proportion of the national budget, teachers' salaries i d
ts account for the great bulk of it. Increasing the establishment of the DOE
and the capital works program are therefore ongoing challengzs for government.
Currently, the organisational structure includes a Director, an SEO (Curriculum), an
SEO (Administration and Assessment), an EO (Early Childhood), a school supervisor
position, an Administrative Officer and a clerk. In a situation where the system is
administered from Funafuti, where communication is very difficult because it is
limited to phone and fax to eight other islands, and where there is a very substantial
administration load, the DOE currently lacks the person-power to undertake any
reform program at the secondary level. Ultimately, the establishment of the DOE will
have to be increased significantly to include a Curriculum Unit.
The second perspective from which the DOE is ill equipped to embark upon a program
of reform is that of technical expertise. Even with an increased establishment of a
curriculum unit the DOE will still need to be strengthened with curriculum design and
development expertise. As a long-term strategy, the strengthening of the curriculum
unit needs to be given more priority in the scholarships program. That is, suitable
people should be enabled to undertake curriculum studies overseas with support from
the national program of scholarships.
The extent of the challenge involved with the reform of the Tuvalu secondary
curriculum cannot be under-estimated in either a workload sense or in an expertise
sense. Re-assigning existing staff (often very busy on other matters) is not a realistic
strategy for addressing the issues.
There are also very substantial school level curriculum issues that have to be
addressed in the national curriculum framework. One is an issue about staff readiness
for curriculum reform, especially reform that assumes a more student centered -
teacher guided curriculum. Much of the teaching at MSS is very teacher centred and
heavily dependent on textbooks. Another and related issue is the quality of curriculum
resources. They are barely adequate to support the current three non-national
curriculum structures. Also the curriculum leadership at the school needs to be '
strengthened. A position of Deputy Principal (Curricdlum) needs to be established.
The appointment should be supported by the scholarships program.
a
Within the reformed FJC structure the school will need a curriculum and moderation
issues such as upgrading of qklificat%ons and
aff (Report on: Tuvalu School Visit by the CDU

- ---,..%.L.--
- -
--
&m&eul?
Issues Identified by MES Personnel and Motufoua SS Staff
-----
.
-
-s
---
-.-.
--?-
. .La.
curriculum Consultancy Mission has been partic'ularly concerned to
- A : ~ , E - -
_ j _ -
-.. .-
. .' iir*
- - .-
$f&%&$ews'of
MES personnel and Motufoua SS staff about the curriculum issues
- .-%-=
. -*.-
-. ---
- . .-..
- ..-- -.
- -
1
"41-1<
1
----
-----tlne$fice;-any proposals for reform that ignore these views risk rejection at the
- - ---'-.T
. ---
---
T& first TOR for the final phase of the mission was:
Conduct consultations with the staff at Motufoua HS regarding the recommended
national curriculum framework outlined in the interim report.
The second interim report prepared by Rejieli Racule for the Mission identified the
main issues as:
Lack of resources
Inadequate facilities
The need for staff development.
5.6 Issues about Vocational Education
To date VET's role in the system has been unclear. What exists has a manual arts
orientation. VET is mostly conceptualised in terms of addressing the standards issue
by providing a less demanding curriculum offering to "less able" students. There
seems little consideration of VET's potential contribution to the national economy.
All of these aspects of the educational and administrative context of the current
Tuvalu curriculum will need to be addressed in any proposal for reform.
6 Curriculum Principles
The Tuvaluan National Curriculum Framework should have as its foundation a set of
appropriate principles. The following principles are suggested as appropriate:
Principle 1: Coherence
The national curriculum framework and its ultimate detail should comprise a coherent
whole within which the links between content and teaching and learning orientations
are made explicit across all year levels.
Principle 2: Consistency with EFL
The curriculum framework and its ultimate detail should support Lifelong Learning. It
shbuld encourage the development of generic skills, thinking skills, cooperative
learning practices, problem-solving skills and other Lifelong Learning abilities and
dispositions such as learning for the sake of learning
ciple 3: Social and Cultural Appropriateness
reflect the current needs of Tuvaluan society and play
active role in
@
mg, preserving and further developing the culture of Tuvalu.

3: Comprehensiveness
- --.--
- - - - --.I-c
-- *..
-
-
ciple; implies that the curriculum has breadth and depth. In this context
-
.
A

L
--.-
+
. .:-
-- -*
.
---- .
means that the content of the curriculum is defensible as appropriate for the
---
- .
- .
--
-.
- .zt c&nt
situation in Tuvalu. Depth infers that there is scope for detailed and
-
inc&&ingly sophisticated treatment of the content.
- -.
--- --
- . -
-
-- -
ere should be provision within the curriculum for clear patterns of connectedness
between levels and sectors.
Principle 7: Contribution to the National Economy
The curriculum framework should make provision for national economic growth and
development.
7 Towards a National Curriculum Framework: Options and
Implications
A national curriculum framework is essentially a policy document. It communicates
an education system's views about what it seeks to have young people know, value
and continuously develop as a set of skills. It also communicates how the
advancements with knowledge and skills, as with the processes used to shape values,
will be monitored, recorded and certificated. It should be thought about as a plan of
action or a "live policy". It is also a coherent plan for the form, scope and sequence of
learning throughout the system's schools (in Tuvalu's case its preschools, primary and
secondary schools as well as further education institutions). It serves to inform the
whole system of the relationships between its component parts and how in
combination they contribute to the growth of the young people for whom they cater
and the nation.
Ideally, the framework should also attend to the prevailing curriculum circumstances
in terms of:
the disposition of DOE personnel to reform,
existing and likely future curriculum management structures,
staff expertise and the potential for staff development,
the existence of curriculum resource materials, the potential for their improvement
and suitable teaching facilities.
That is, the framework should be realistic and achievable.
The following scenarios have been constructed in terms of these issues. They lay out a
set of realistic possibilities for reform given the contingencies of the educational and
administrative context of the Tuvaluan curriculum. Any choice from them rests with
the Ministry of Education. When donor agencies are considering sufport for
curriculum reform proposals the scenarios can be used to help shape responses.

. .
. ..
.
.'
. .
'k .-
.
,
.
'&.
. .
,. .. .
7,'.
.
: : ..
. .
..
Consultancy Mission
Tuvalu bath
d in the DOE
that large scale reform is not achievable. This proposal acknowledges that and seeks
to maintain a measure of the status quo whilst still producing a new structure
consistent with the principles outlined earlier and consistent with the goal of the
reform having to be achievable, A national curriculum framework for Tuvalu that
continues with the academic orientation currently prevalent in the country is
reproduced below. The suitability of the framework is then subsequently a p e d for in
terms of the major issues outlined in Section 2 above and the implications for
adopting it are discussed.
Pacific Secondary School Certificate with two groups in mind - those aspiring
to further education and those not. For the former group the current subjects
would continue to be offered. For the latter group the offerings would be
contained to a limited subject range possiblv including the following. The
range would need to be negotiated with MSS staff.
English
One of Chemistry, Physics, Biology
One of Accounting, Economics
Mathematics,
One of Geography and History
Agriculture1 Technical Drawing1 Tuvaluan Studies.
0
9 & 10 Reformed Fiji Junior Certificate: Mathematics, Social Science, Science, English
& Electives. This offered in two streams, one over two years and the other over
I three years.
1 1-8
I TAESP: Retain as is.
1 ECE I Two Year Broad Framework Curriculum
a*
consolidates existing arrangements and abolishes the TSC. The senior
- -- -
rriculum (Years 11 & 12) is taken over a two year period. -Year 11 is-
- -
preparatory year during which candidates are inducted into a more .-
of SPBEA subjects than are currently offered at Motufoua H$. One-of--- - - - ----
-- -
- -
truncating the curriculum offerings in this way is to enable the school
-- - , - .
- -
eachers into one of two groups, "senior school" teachers and teachers
..
--
- -
- -
- .. -.
.
- -
-- *
I
. '?
- - .- ..".
- --? --
",.
- - -
-
-
-
?

10
"
A

-.7--t*-
-
- - -
.-_
_.
__ - - -,.-n
- & Z ~

e reformed FJC ("junior school" teachers). Those in the~~uni~r.school"
would
a greater role for the "pastoral care" for the younger students,.concentrate on
ing their literacy and numeracy skills and preparing them~fort~successfu~
FJC
enence. Those in the "senior school" would be PSSC subject specia&.
-
-
7.2 Implications of Option 1
This option requires:
H Refurbished science facilities
H A computing laboratory and related staff training
H Refurbished Home Economics facilities
H A substantial staff development project on formative assessment and quality
teaching and learning
H A staff development project for "senior school" teachers to strengthen their subject
knowledge bas;
H A staff development project for "junior school" teachers to assist with student
welfare and the development of literacy and numeracy
H A staff development project to assist all teachers to make substantive connections
across the reformed FJC and the PSSC
A staff member from MSS to attend training in Suva in August or September 2004
on the revised FJC and moderation of assessment for FJC at MSS
The limitations of the option are:
H It does not address well the overcrowding issue at Motufoua HS and related issues.
It does not address sufficiently well enough the issue of "standards" and concerns
about poor performance at secondary school by Tuvaluan youth.
It does not incorporate an adequate VET dimension to the secondary curriculum.
It does not sit well with the early thinking and possible directions of the recent
ADB mission especially with regard to VET and the Community Vocational
Centres.
The strengths of the option are:
It approximates the "status quo" and thus it should make the reform achievable.
.
H It does not require major capital works.
H It links the FJC and the PSSC.
#
The implications of the model for requests from donor agencies are:
H School refurbishment including curriculum resources .
H Teacher development projects

Kzr".;12: -+"Sa
T
'
"'C -.
&y-T%~z:**;
i,c.-y.1.:2;3;
-.Option 2 - A Comprehensive Model
e+j&&-&~~*aG%=:<=~
.
~~~-2&~~~e%eih=Feeddconsiderable
attention given to reforming the curriculum in Tuvalu so
-.
-
.
* .-
- -
- .
---
r
-
2
. .-
-
3 r . . - * * l * - * l = " " . , ~ - -
-----. . .
-tIiat;T'it:
takes better account of the standards issues and provides greater opportunities
. - + -
-r--
-I.l
4--
y+"
- - -
-.-.-
r , -
for VET: Option 2 considers this position.
Pacific Secondary School Certificate with two groups in mind - those
aspiring to further education and those not. For the former group the
current subjects would continue to be offered. For the latter group the
offerings would be contained to a limited subject range possibh
including the following. The range would need to be negotiated with
MSS staff:
English
One of Chemistry, Physics, Biology
One of Accounting, Economics
Mathematics,
One of Geography and History
Agriculture/ Technical Drawing1 Tuvaluan Studies.
VET Stream: Five subjects from English, Mathematics, Science, Design
Technology and new VET SPBEA "school subjects".
u
9 & 10 Reformed Fiji Junior Certificate: Mathematics, Social Science, Science, English
& VET Electives. Two streams: one for two vears the other for three vears.
Academic and Vocational Orientation Entry Test
u
1 1-8
I TAESP: Retain as is.
1
.
I ECE I Two Year Broad Framework Curriculum
This proposal advances the argument from MSS for a comprehensive arrangement to
the curriculum. As with the previous model, the senior secondary curriculum (Years
11 & 12) is taken over a two year period. Year 11 is considered a preparatory year
during which candidates are inducted into a more limited range of SPBEA~ubjects
offered at Motufoua HS. A VET program would run alongside the
on for truncating the curriculum offerings at Years 11 & 12 is to
to concentrate teachers into one of two groups, seniot school
ers of the reformed FJC. Those in the "juni'of school" would assume
e in the "pastoral care" for the younger students and in assisting with their
numeracy development.
.

culum development work especially with VET subjects
-
Refurbishment of Science and Home Economics facilities
Staff development in formative assessment and quality teaching and learning
. .
Major capital works program to accommodate more students and the VET
component
A computing laboratory and related staff training
Teacher recruitment program for VET staff
A staff member from MSS to attend training in Suva in August or September 2004
on the revised FJC and moderation of assessment for FJC at MSS
The limitations of the option are:
There is limited expertise in the VET field.
The strengths of the option are:
W It addresses the standards issue well.
W It connects the FJC and PSSC
It establishes a program with the potential to contribute to the national economy.
The implications of the model for requests from donor agencies are:
Capital works to accommodate VET and a greater number of students
W School refurbishment
W Teacher development projects
7.5
Option 3 - A Vocational Centre Model
current subjects would continue to be offered. For the latter group the
including the following. The range would need to be negotiated with
.
One of Chemistry, Physics, Biology
W One of Accounting, Economics

Reformed Fiji Junior Certificate for Training Centres on Funafuti and the
those -
clearly
performing other Islands:
satisfactorily
on
the
TSSE A VET program consisting of
examination: Mathematics, Social Accounting/Bookkeeping,
Science,
Science,
English
& Mechanics,
Refrigeration
electives.
Engineering, Computing for those not
performing satisfactorily on the TSSE
examination.
Academic and Vocational Orientation Entry Test
1 1-8
I TAESP: Retain as is.
I ECE I Two Year Broad Framework Curriculum
I
7.6 Implications of Option 3
This option requires:
W Considerable curriculum development work especially with VET subjects for
which there is limited expertise
Refurbishment of Science and Home Economics facilities
Staff development in forrnative assessment and quality teaching and learning
Minor capital works program on the community centres
A computing laboratory and related staff training
A staff member from MSS to attend training in Suva in August or Septembei- 2004
on the revised FJC and moderation of assessment for FJC at MSS
Tha limitations of the option are:
There is limited expertise in the VET field.
It limits access to the senior years.
ngths of the option are:
resses the standards issue well.
es VET a more prominent part of the curriculum.
.
. .
.
. . .. .
.

f Tuvalu as it gives
ler in this report and the
ce. Howevef, the extent to which the
mapped below and then
Limited Reform
M
M
M
H
H
L
Comprehensive
H
H
M
H
H
H
H
Vocational
H
H
M
H
H
H
H
Centre
The limited reform model provides a considerable measure of curriculum coherence
assuming that in revising the FJC the Fijian Ministry of Education attend carefully to
the Tuvaluan cultural issues in the curriculum. This would be assisted by making
MSS a trial school in 2005. It should be further enhanced by having someone from
MSS trained in Suva in the reforms of the FJC in August or September. Involvement
in the 2005 pilot program is contingent on this training beingundertaken. It is also
moderately consistent with EFL in that it seeks to retain a maximum number of young
people at school at least until Year 10. Given that staff are able to interpret the FJC in
Tuvaluan terms it moderately satisfies the third principle. It also makes provision for
larger numbers to stay on at school than at
1t provides breadthand depth to
the curriculum and allows students to move through the system. However, the option
does not accommodate VET well. The comprehensive model satisfies all criteria well
except that of cultural relevance. If the same approach mentioned above about this
issue- were adopted in this case though the criterion would be moderately satisfied.
The same applies to the Vocational Centre Model.
Appropriateness; Principle 4: Equal Access; Principle 5: Comprehensiveness; Principk 6:
le 7: Contributes to National Economy

. .

assumes the introduction of the re
possible.
of poor
on TSSE examination.
As soon as
Staff development program designed to rectify the causes of poor
oossible.
~erformance.
I As soon as I Refurbishment of facilities at MSS for Science and Home Economics I
possible.
Mid 2004
Negotiate with MSS which of the three options for a curriculum
framework outlined earlier in this report should be implemented at
MSS.
Mid 2004
Apply for MSS to be a pilot school for MSS trial during 2005.
I %ember
August/
I Appoint a person at MSS to be the FJC coordinator. -
Arrange for
attendance-at training in Suva.
- .
Early 2005 Arrange for accreditation of PSSC school subject in Tuvaluan.
Early 2005
.
Arrange staff development program for staff at MSS for:
I
I Quality teaching and Learning
I
I
I H Assessment
I
I
I H VET
I
.
I
I Aligning the FJC and PSSC curricula
10 Terms of Reference
10.1 Responses to the TORS for the Initial Phase of the Tuvalu Curriculum
Consultancy Mission
The initial TORS for the mission were addressed in the interim report. The responses
to them are reiterated here.
TOR Number 1 - Review of current secondary school curriculum arrangemeits
A curriculum framework should be consistent with the overall philosophy of the
s;stem, be socially and culturally appropriate, map a plan for improved and relevant
learning and link, in a comprehensive way, all education sectors. Currently,.there is no
such framework in Tuvalu. The current disjointed currictflum provision arrangements
are reflected below.

Ofered at ~otufbua:
External and school based CATS. I
Subjects: English, Chemistry, Accounting, Satisfactorily completed subjects .
Development Studies, Mathematics,
recorded on certificate as a grade
Geography, History, Physics, Biology,
(1 -9) or assessment descriptor
Design Technology, Economics.
Not offered at Motufoua:
Agriculture,
French,
Computer Studies.
11
Tuvalu School Certificate
Setting, marking and monitoring
Subjects:
by SPBEA.
Accounting, Economics, Science,
satisfactorily completed subjects
Geography, History, Mathematics,
recorded on certificate as a grade
Technical Drawing, Woodwork, Food &
( 1-91
Nutrition.
9 &10 Fiji Junior Certificate
FJC: English, Mathematics, Social
Core Subjects:
Science, Basic Science and best
Mathematics, Social Science, Basic
two others.
Science, English
Possible score = 300
Electives:
Agriculture, Economics, Wood Work,
Technical Drawing, Home Economics,
Accounting.
1 - 8
Classes 1 & 2: Creative Activities, Tuvalu Screening test set by secondary
Language, English, Mathematics, Physical teachers at Year 8 for streaming
Education, Printing, Singing, Social
purposes.
Science.
PILLS at Years 4 and 6 every
Classes 3-6: Tuvalu Language, English,
second year
Social Science, Elementary Science,
Mathematics, Music, Art and Craft,
Physical Education.
Classes 7-8: Commercial Studies,
Elementary Science, Tuvalu Language,
English, Home Economics, Mathematics,
a
Music, Physical Education, Social
Science, Technical Drawing.
TAESP: English, Mathematics, Science,
Social Science, Health, Business Studies
(7&8 only).
ECE
No formal curriculum

erhaul of the curriculum on the grounds of
-
m- - Lack of fit with the national policy of EFL, especially regarding access and equity
I
Possiblekontribution to student disengagement and teacher cynicism
Lack of fit with current socid and economic imperatives of Tuvalu
'
Unnecessary emphasis on competitive academic assessment
Inordinately strong academic orientation at the expense of vocational offerings
Overly strong concern with tertiary selection issues
Absence of a common design framework across all levels.
TOR Number 2 - Consult with ministry ofSicials on curriculum issues
The main issues identified were:
1. The absence of a National Curriculum Framework.
2. The need for strengthening the curriculum expertise in the DOE to enable a
National Curriculum Framework to be developed and disseminated.
3. The reliance on a non-national curriculum at the Forms 3 & 4 levels.
4. The absence of a design framework at the Early Childhood level.
5. The lack of skilled personnel within DOE to design and elaborate appropriate
curricula.
6. Limited curriculum expertise at the school level, most especially in the secondary
sector.
7. The absence of a strategic plan for addressing the issues.
TOR Number 3 - Consult with regional organisations like USP and SPBEA
The major curriculum issues that emerged from the consultations were:
1. The concerns of USP about the standards of graduates from Motufoua SS
2. The emphasis of the current senior secondary curriculum on selection issues at the
expense of vocational issues.
3. The encouragement of SPBEA for schools to move away from sunknative'
assessment and shift to more formative approaches especially in the early
secondary years.
4.' The development of a new SPBEA regional qualification in the form of a Year 7
program.
5. Provision of "school based" subjects through SPBEA k d the extent to which they
are under-utilised.
TOR Number 4 - Advise and assist the Ministry of Education to' identifithe key
-problems of the current system
- .
The key issues are:
1. Lack of a strategic plan
. - . -
-
-. -
2. Lack of a national framework
3. Inappropriate junior secondary curriculum

context because of the absence of
sist the Ministry of Education to develop appropriate
2. Increase the establishment of DOE to include a curriculum unit
3. As a long-term strategy include the need for increasing curriculum expertise as a
criterion for scholarships
4. As a short term strategy, seek LTA for the Curriculum Unit in General Curriculum
and STA in subject specific curriculum especially English, Mathematics, Science,
Social Science, HealthPhysical Education and Vocational Education. In part,
enlist the STAs in a school based staff development program at Motufoua SS.
5. As a starting point concentrate resource and effort at the Form 3 & 4 levels. This
is suggested for two reasons. One is that this is the field onto which the good work
of TAESP can be overlain. The other is that the upper components of the
secondary curriculum (especially PSSC) are subject to influence from policy
changes (like the Year 7 developments) which should be given time to evolve
before any reforms at that level are attempted.
TOR Number 6 - Provide advice on the Ministry's broader plans to introduce:
Junior secondary schools
Form 7 at Motufoua
Develop a Tuvaluan curriculum, with particular reference to the current
administrative capacity of the Ministry of Education. This should include views on
the implications of these changes for ongoing curriculum management, curriculum
development and training and the implementation of new curricula.
Advice regarding Junior Secondary Schools
The intention to introduce Junior High Schools as a
way of extending greater
a9cess for young people at the Years 9-10 levels would produce a greater number of
curriculum challenges, and probably require much more capital works, than the
urrent Primary Schools to become Junior High Schools m
effects of TAESP.

~ i & l
Report for the Tuvalu
%.: ~
..
..
v. 3
-.
Advice regarding Form 7 at
There are many unresolved i
replace the current NZUBA not 1
stands there is considerable likeliho
with the current PSSC arrangements
Form 7 at this stage. Indeed its early introduction could unnecessarily add to the
already pressing curriculum and staffing issues at the school. Given the relatively
small numbers in Tuvalu that afe affected by the policy changes about a Regional
Form 7, it would be more prudent to proceed with the current efforts that are being
made to extend the USP Foundation Year Program at the USP Centre on Funafuti and
concentrate on expanding the offerings at Motufoua SS into the Vocational area.
Advice regarding the development of a Tuvaluan Curriculum
There is an almost~unanimous
view that the FJC is no longer appropriate for Tuvalu.
There is also a widely held view that some of the significant outcomes of TAESP
have been more locally appropriate curriculum materials and resources, much
improved teaching and learning (in a student centred sense) and increased morale. The
building blocks for a Tuvaluan curriculum are there. It should be a strategic priority to
extend the good work into lower secondary. However, such a decision has serious
organisational, infrastructure, staff development and policy implications. It will have
to be planned exceedingly carefully at least over a five year period. Such a decision
would mean:
Increasing the establishment of the DOE to provide the system with additional
curriculum person power and expertise
Altering the MES policy on scholarships to include curriculum expertise in the
selection criteria.
H That there would be very substantial staff development requirements, particularly
at Motufoua SS.
That there would be very substantial infrastructure costs involving refurbishment
at Motufoua SS and computing facilities.
10.2 Responses to the Terms of Reference for the Final Phase of the Mission
TOR Number 1: Conduct consultations with the staff at Motufoua HS regarding.
the recommended national curriculum framework outlined in the interim report.
The interim report prepared by Rejieli Racule elaborates the views of all stakeholders
in* this regard. The views of all stakeholders have been taken into account in the
preparation of this final report and where appropriate they have been used to assist in
the formulation of the national framework and the details thereof that are contained in
tions from which the Government of Tuvalu might

ation of a final draft of a proposal for th&efonn of thejunior secondary
culum for consideration by the Government of Tuvalu.
s report provides three options from which the-Government of Tuvalu might
choose and negotiate with the staff of MSS.
-
TOR Number 4: Assist staff of the Tuvalu Department of Education with the
preparation of a final draft of a long-term forward plan for the reform of the
secondary curriculum for consideration by the Government of Tuvalu.
The draft appears as section 9 of this report.
TOR Number 5: Prepare a final report on the consultancy mission for AusAID
and the Government of Tuvalu incorporating comments, if any, from AusAlCD
and the Government of Tuvalu.
The draft final repbrt was shared with AusAlD at a meeting in Suva on 12/5/04. The
written comments from AusAID comprised the statement:
There appears to be a lower priority for the provision of such resources to
Motufoua SS. In a list of priorities for NZ Aid funds, the University of
the South Pacific's Augmented Program's facilities at Funafuti were put
ahead of those at Motufoua SS. The position of a laboratory technician
has been advertised at the USP Foundation Centre. However there are
only 34 students currently attending the Centre (with only a proportion of
them studying sciences) compared to 430 students at Motufoua SS with
no working laboratories or lab assistants. At MSS the situation regarding
school supplies is quite desperate. Very little money is allocated to this.
As an example, there are no dusters available this year, let alone
textbooks. Money allocated to the school seems to be shifted to other
Departments without consultation with the school. ICT is very limited.
Motufoua SS has access to only three computers and fax and phone
facilities are at best erratic.
AusAlD requested that this statement be used in a meeting to debrief on this report
with the Tuvalu Government officials to initiate discussions to propose solutions to.
resource allocation issues.
The draft final report was also shared with the Secretary of Education and sport in a
debriefing session on Funafuti on 14/5/04. No written comments were received.

culty so many students are having with the TSSE examinatio
of TAESP at Forms 1 & 2 level be conducted to identify
-
so&e/s of these difficulties.
--
A refurbishment program of facilities and curriculum resources at MSS be made a
priority.
During late 2004 the DOE request that Motufoua SS be a pilot school for the
reformed FJC.
During 2004 a person from Motufoua SS be trained as a moderator within the
training program being conducted by the Fiji Ministry of Education's CDU.
From 2006 the Tuvalu Secondary Certificate be phased out and the secondary
curriculum be comprised of a minimum of two years study for the revised FJC and
a further minimum of two years study for the PSSC in one of the forms described
in this report.
In 2005 the DOE conduct a series of staff development programs for MSS staff on
Quality Teaching and Learning
Assessment
VET
Aligning the FJC and PSSC curricula
12 References
Report on: Tuvalu School Visit by the CDU Unit of the Fiji Ministry of Education.
Knapman, B. Ponton, M & Hunt, C (2002) Tuvalu: 2002 Economic and Public Sector
Review. AusAID and Asian Development Bank.
Westover, D. (2000) Basic Education Review. Funafuti: Department of Education.
AusAID. AESOP.
Education for All Report of National Plan, , Ministry of Education, Culture and
Sports, September 200 1
Handbook of General Pedagogical Advice for Primary Teachers. TAESP 2002
Motufoua Secondary School Curriculum Review, IOE, ~ n f v e r s i t ~
of
the South
Pacific, 1981
Report on Tuvalu School Visit, Ministry of Education, Fiji, February 2003
,.
Tuvalu Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET)
Study Draft,
David Burrowes and Namoliki Sualiki Neeia
-
--
Supervision Handbook for Senior Education Officers, School Sup&visors and School
Leaders, TAESP, 2OO3.
-

aged by RMIT International and AusAID, the major client,
ing people contributed to the mission.
Phase 1
Ana Raivoce
Professional Officer
South Pacific Board Educational Assessment
Melinia Ratudina
AusAID (Suva)
Nicki Wrighton
NZAID (Suva)
Shamina Narayan
European Union
Eline yce
USP Center (Tuvalu)
David Manuella
Director
DOE Tuvalu
Teimana
Early Childhood Education Officer
DOE
Valisi Alimau
Supervisor
DOE
Maseiga Osema
Early Childhood Education Officer
D6E
Sootaga Paape
Senior Supervisor
Temusika Harnuma and staff
Principal
~ a u t i
Primary
Siaufisi Kirimau and staff
SDA Primary School
~gnafuti

r.'
Fulitusi Alovaka
Fetuvalu High School
Dr Aklmila Nama Shalma
University of the South Pacific
Small Business Operators
Funafuti Community
Captain Jonathon Gayton
Tuvalu Maritime Training Institute
Leti Pelesala
Shadow Minister
Education
Filoimea Telito
Principal
Motufoua Secondary School
George Boyd
Motufoua Secondary School
Shayne Boyd
Motufoua Secondary School
Dr Ana Taufeulungaki
University of the South Pacific
Hans Zindel
SPBEA
Mrs Salste Rabuka
Fiji Ministry of Education
Mr Sela
Fiji Curriculum Unit
$
Final Phase
Tuvalu Ministry of Education
Mrs Lina Petaia
Secretary of Education
Mr David Manuella
Director of Education
P
,
Mrs Valisi Tovia Alimau
SEO Curriculum
Mrs Katalina Taloka
SEO Assessment
Mrs Teimana Avanitelo
EO Early Childhood Education

Staff of Motofoua Secondary School
Rev. Filoimea Telito
Principal
Mr Lapana Ene
Deputy Principal
Mr George Boyd
T.A., ~ d v i s z r
to the Principal
Mrs S h a p e Boyd
T.A., Adviser, English Dept
English Department
Teachers
Sivaga Filo
HOD
Lise Talia
Meleana Pila
Kiunui Leofasi
Maola Sbalo
Mathematics De~artment
Teachers
Vili Lagi
HOD
Efoti Ala
Faga Ikapoti
Fauina Lagi
Kapuana
Science De~artment
Teachers
Michael Noaga
A/HOD
Fuifui Tui
Seveleni Kapua
Maeva Tauafi
Tekua Willy
Agricultural Science
Teachers
Sam Panapa
Teagai Esekia
Social Science/Commerce
Teachers
Elika Repeuga
9
Lolohea Kelesoma
Linosia Paleni
Iofobina Sosene
Senetima Lomi
Ale Ioane
Tinai Temamila
Elaine
Laupepa

Vaiega Lui
Physical Education/Music
Takiao Vave
Vili Lagi
Tuvaluan Studies
Vaiefu Liu
Religious Studies
Rev Sanaila Bici
Isopo Sioni
Staff of Nauti Primarv School, Funafuti Island
Temukisa Hauma
Head Teacher
Vinepa Pelena
HOD Infant Department
Tiutupe Puava
AIHead Teacher
Staff of Tutasi Primarv School. Nukufetau Island
Vaitupu Nukualofa
Head Teacher
Lepalo Teafiula
Misikata Ielomi
Telutu Fuaki
Tovia Tovia
Laumoli Temese
Lilivanu Maketi
Milikini Telava
Maneapa F.
Faoso Henele
Head Teacher, Tolise Primary
School, Vaitupu Island.


   © 2006, USP Library. Copyright & Disclaimer                         Contact Us
last updated Sat Sep 01, 2012